On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > This is really a pretty small patch all things considered, and pretty > low-risk (although I haven;t been threough the code in fine detail yet). > In the end I'm persuaded by Andres' point that there's actually no > practical alternative way to make sure the data is actually synced to disk. > > If nobody else wants to pick it up I will, unless there is a strong > objection.
Thanks! -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
