On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> I found a new way to break it: run the trigger function so
>> that the plan is cached by plpgsql, then ALTER TABLE incompatibly,
>> then run the trigger function again. See attached.
>
> [...]
>
> I expected that existing mechanisms would have forced re-planning of
> a trigger function if the table the function was attached to was
> altered. Either that was a bit "optimistic", or the old TupleDesc
> is used for the new plan. Will track down which it is, and fix it.
When PlanCacheRelCallback runs, I don't think it understands that
these named tuplestore RangeTblEntry objects are dependent on the
subject table. Could that be fixed like this?
@@ -2571,6 +2582,9 @@ extract_query_dependencies_walker(Node *node,
PlannerInfo *context)
if (rte->rtekind == RTE_RELATION)
context->glob->relationOids =
lappend_oid(context->glob->relationOids, rte->relid);
+ else if (rte->rtekind == RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE)
+ context->glob->relationOids =
+
lappend_oid(context->glob->relationOids, [subject table's OID]);
}
> I'll post a new patch once I figure out the dropped column on the
> cached function plan.
If that's fixed and the permissions question can be waved away by
saying it's the same as the per-row situation, my only other comment
would be a bikeshed issue: Enr isn't a great name for a struct.
Very keen to see this feature in PostgreSQL 10!
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
