On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > In short, it seems like this statement in the docs is correctly describing > our code's behavior, but said behavior is wrong and should be changed. > I'd propose fixing it like that in HEAD; I'm not sure if the back branches > should also be changed.
Sounds reasonable, but I don't see much advantage to changing it in the back-branches. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
