On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> Committed after rewording the documentation.
>
> Hm. Wonder if something like that shouldn't be backpatched - because
> otherwise using postgres_fdw from an old server against a newer one will
> do weird stuff.  I don't know what kind of policy we've committed to
> with postgresImportForeignSchema...

I don't think I'd like to promise that postgres_fdw will always be
forward-compatible.  Backward-compatibility is hard enough already.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to