Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2017-02-14 14:18:54 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> One point that could use further review is whether the de-duplication >> algorithm is actually correct. I'm only about 95% convinced by the >> argument I wrote in planunionor.c's header comment.
> Are you planning to push this into v10? Given the looming freeze I'm > inclined to bump this to the next CF. I'm still not fully convinced the patch is correct, so I have no problem with bumping it out. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers