Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
1. Do we want to someday allow groups to have groups as members? (Seems
reasonable to me.)
I agree.
I think the other requirement of roles is that they are able to own objects.
ie. we need to allow groups to own objects.
This would also solve the problem that information_schema views will
show only owned objects. If objects are created as owned by a proper
role, not only the creator will be able to use these views.
Regards,
Andreas
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
