Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) > > - fair number of people don't think it's ready for v10.
Given the number of votes against putting this on pg10, I am going to back off from this patch now, with an eye towards putting it in pg11 as soon as the tree opens. Either I or Pavan are going to post another version of this patch series, within the next couple of weeks, so that others can base their testing, review and suggestions. > > - can't move to next fest because it's waiting-on-author, which doesn't > > allow that. Doesn't strike me as a useful restriction. > > I agree that that CF app restriction makes little sense. What the restriction means is that if a patch is in waiting-on-author, the proper "close" action is to return-with-feedback. There is no point in moving the patch to the next commitfest if there is no further patch version. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
