On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 4/7/17 01:10, Masahiko Sawada wrote: >>> It's not critical but it could be problem. So I thought we should fix >>> it before the PostgreSQL 10 release. If it's not appropriate as an >>> open item I'll remove it. >> >> You wrote that you "sent" a patch, but I don't see a patch anywhere. >> >> I think a nonintrusive patch for this could be considered. > > Oops, I made a mistake. I'll send a patch tomorrow. >
I've attached the patch. This patch introduces GUC parameter table_sync_retry_interval which controls the interval of launching the table sync worker process. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
table_sync_retry_interval.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
