Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 09:58:07AM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> --progress-timestamp is supposed to make -P report a Unix Epoch time stamp,
>> for easy correlation with the entries in other log files (like the postgres
>> server log file using %n).
>>
>> But that broke in this commit:
>>
>> commit 1d63f7d2d180c8708bc12710254eb7b45823440f
>> Author: Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
>> Date: Mon Jan 2 13:41:51 2017 -0500
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Tom,
> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
> this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
> toward speedy resolution. Thanks.
I'll take a look, and either fix it or post another update before the
end of the week.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
