On 2017-04-13 12:56:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > Cool. I wonder if we also should remove AtEOXact_CatCache()'s > > cross-checks - the resowner replacement has been in place for a while, > > and seems robust enough. They're now the biggest user of time. > > Hm, biggest user of time in what workload? I've not noticed that > function particularly.
Just initdb. I presume it's because the catcaches will frequently be relatively big there. > I agree that it doesn't seem like we need to spend a lot of time > cross-checking there, though. Maybe keep the code but #ifdef it > under some nondefault debugging symbol. Hm, if we want to keep it, maybe tie it to CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS or such, so it gets compiled at least sometimes? Not a great fit, but ... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
