On 14 April 2017 at 08:13, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Attached patch gets rid of a "is has". Yes, its a typo, but doesn't add missing information or change the meaning. It should be fixed, but could I suggest we include that in your next lot of doc changes, rather than keep making single minor changes? (I had understood that we were going to add more docs together, but I was awaiting your restructuring patch) -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
