On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > BTW, I remain totally mystified as to what people think the semantics of > partitioning ought to be. Child columns can have a different type from > parent columns? Really? Why is this even under discussion? We don't > allow that in old-school inheritance, and I cannot imagine a rational > argument why partitioning should allow it. > No, we aren't doing that. We are discussing here how to represent partition bounds of top level join and all the intermediate joins between A, B and C which are partitioned tables with different partition key types. We are not discussing the column types of children, join or simple. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
