I wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> On 2017-04-20 19:23:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> or are the HANDLEs in a Windows WaitEventSet not inheritable >>> resources?
>> So that kind of sounds like it should be doable. > Ah, good. I'll add a comment about that and press on. So ... what would you say to replacing epoll_create() with epoll_create1(EPOLL_CLOEXEC) ? Then a WaitEventSet would not represent inheritable-across-exec resources on any platform, making it a lot easier to deal with the EXEC_BACKEND case. AFAIK, both APIs are Linux-only, and epoll_create1() is not much newer than epoll_create(), so it seems like we'd not be giving up much portability if we insist on epoll_create1. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers