Hi, Jeff! I'm planning to provide the review for this patch in future. I've done some performance tesing (see attachment). All in all, nothing important, everything works fine. Tests were executed under current HEAD on Ubuntu 16 over MacBook Air.
I observe that: 1. Patch brings performance improvement for specified query 2. Performance improvement of Range Merge Join vs GiST Nested Loop Join (on Index Only Scan) is between 4x and 6x 3. Performance improvement of RMJ with B-tree index vs GiST is between 4x and 10x (due to lack of actually competing cases, here I omit T-tests, they are not that important when speaking about 4x difference) 4. Range Merge Join is capable to consume expressional index with exactly same effect as direct index 5. Other attributes residing in joined tables do not affect performance improvement I'll make code review some time later, probably next week. (I hope there is no urge in this, since commitfest is in July, or is it urgent?) BTW fixe typo in index specification of original performance test (both indexes were for same table) Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
perf2.sql
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
