On 2017-04-21 17:04:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Some excavation in the buildfarm database says that the coverage for > the recovery-check test has been mighty darn thin up until just > recently.
Hm, not good. Just enabled it for most of my animals (there seems to be no point in having it on the C89 animal). Very curious what it'll do to skink's runtime :/. I'll add a few more cores to the machine, otherwise it'll probably wreak havock. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
