On April 23, 2017 10:31:18 PM PDT, Petr Jelinek <petr.jeli...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >On 24/04/17 04:31, Petr Jelinek wrote: >So actually maybe running regression tests through it might be >reasonable approach if we add new make target for it.
That sounds like a good plan. >Note that the first patch is huge. That's because I needed to add >alternative output for largeobject test because it uses fastpath >function calls which are not allowed over replication protocol. There's no need for that restriction, is there? At least for db walsenders... >As part of this I realized that the parser fallback that I wrote >originally for handling SQL in walsender is not robust enough as the >lexer would fail on some valid SQL statements. So there is also second >patch that does this using different approach which allows any SQL >statement. Haven't looked at the new thing yet, but I'm not particularly surprised... Wonder of there's a good way to fully integrate both grammars, without exploding keywords. Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
