On 2017-04-24 11:42:12 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: > The explain analyze of the hash step of a hash join reports something like > this: > > -> Hash (cost=458287.68..458287.68 rows=24995368 width=37) (actual > rows=24995353 loops=1) > Buckets: 33554432 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 2019630kB > > > Should the HashAggregate node also report on Buckets and Memory Usage? I > would have found that useful several times. Is there some reason this is > not wanted, or not possible?
I've wanted that too. It's not impossible at all. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
