On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:05:41PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I think the above commit needs a separate mention, as this is a really > > huge step forward to control the size of hash indexes. > > Yes, it is unfotunate that the item is in the incompatibility item. I > wonder if I should split out the need to rebuild the hash indexes and > keep it there and move this item into the "Index" section.
Done, items split. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
