On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> >
> > Maybe a better strategy would be to get a release out soon but not wait
> > 6 months for another release which would contain the Win32 port and the
> > PITR stuff (assuming those aren't done in time for this release).
> >
> > Just a thought.
>
> And definitely in agreement here ... I'd rather see a shortened dev cycle
> prompted by a big feature being added, then delaying a release because "oh
> oh, I need another few weeks" that draws out when something unexpected
> happens :(
>
>...
I'm not sure why another delay is being considered. There's been a delay of
a week because of the server problems hasn't there and wasn't the original
delay only acceptable on the basis that that was that and there wasn't going to
be another extension?
--
Nigel Andrews
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
