2017-05-01 1:21 GMT+02:00 Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de>: > On 2017-04-30 07:19:21 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > why we cannot to introduce GUC option - enable_cteoptfence ? > > Doesn't really solve the issue, and we've generally shied away from GUCs > that influence behaviour after a few bad experiences. What if you want > one CTE inlined, but another one not? >
It change behave in same sense like enable_nestloop, enable_hashjoin, ... with same limits. Regards Pavel > > - Andres >
