On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: >> I think the patch that Fujii Masao has proposed has found general >> agreement. I would recommend that he commits it as he sees fit. > > This is not a conforming status update, because it does not specify a date for > your next update.
If Peter thinks that the issues fixed by this patch don't really need to be corrected, then we could interpret this as a statement that it should not be listed as an open item but that he does not object to someone else fixing it anyway. If these are real issues, then Peter should take responsibility for them because they were created by his commit. If Fujii Masao is willing to help by committing the patch in question, great; but if not, then Peter should be responsible for committing. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
