On 5/1/17 13:43, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 4/30/17 20:52, Noah Misch wrote: >> IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED. This PostgreSQL 10 open item is long past due >> for your status update. Please thoroughly reacquaint yourself with the >> policy >> on open item ownership[1] and then reply immediately. If I do not hear from >> you by 2017-05-02 01:00 UTC, I will transfer this item to release management >> team ownership without further notice. > > I'm reviewing this now and will report tomorrow.
We have consensus around a patch, but we are still discussing and discovering some new details. There is also the question of whether to backpatch and how far. (Could be all the way to 9.2.) I propose, if there are no new insights by Friday, I will commit the current patch to master, which will fix the reported problem for PG10, and punt the remaining side issues to "Older Bugs". -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
