On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > You're right. I agree that whatever text we add here should be pointing > out that statement-level triggers of affected child tables are not fired, > when root parent is specified in the command. > > Since there was least some talk of changing that behavior for regular > inheritance so that statement triggers of any affected children are fired > [1], I thought we shouldn't say something general that applies to both > inheritance and partitioning. But since nothing has happened in that > regard, we might as well. > > How about the attached?
Looks better, but I think we should say "statement" instead of "operation" for consistency with the previous paragraph, and it certainly shouldn't be capitalized. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
