On 2017-05-04 19:45:33 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > Increment phs_cblock without checking rs_nblocks, but outside of the > lock do a % scan->rs_nblocks, to get the "actual" position. Finish if > (phs_cblock - phs_startblock) / scan->rs_nblocks >= 1.
Err, as I've been pointed to: It should be s/lock/atomic operation/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
