On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 5/5/17 08:43, David Rowley wrote: > > How about we get the ball rolling on this in v10 and pull that part > > out of the docs. If anything that'll buy us a bit more wiggle room to > > change this in v11. > > > > I've attached a proposed patch. > > If we just tell them that the thing they might have relied on might go > away, without a replacement to suggest, then we're just confusing and > scaring them, no? > We'd end up suggesting our OFFSET 0 hack as true protection. If they know for a fact that their use of CTE for its barrier properties is not supported they are also more likely to document intentional usage with something like: "-- CHANGE THIS ONCE VERSION 11 IS RELEASED!!! --" which would make finding the call sites that need to add the new "MATERIALIZED" keyword much easier. David J.
