On 11/05/17 09:27, Noah Misch wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 05:01:00PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 5/7/17 04:21, Noah Misch wrote: >>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Peter, >>> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open >>> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a >>> v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on >>> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days >>> of >>> this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers >>> may >>> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all >>> fixed >>> well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your >>> efforts >>> toward speedy resolution. Thanks. >> >> I think we have a workable patch, but it needs some rebasing. I hope to >> have this sorted by Wednesday. > > This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send > a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status > update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com >
The patch Peter mentioned was committed. There is however another open item associated with this thread for which there is another patch as well. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
