Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> writes:
> Eval_const_expressions() doesn't know about ScalarArrayOpExpr.
> ...
> That seems like an oversight. I guess that scenario doesn't happen very 
> often in practice, but there's no reason not to do it when it does. 
> Patch attached.

Yeah, I think it's a lack-of-round-tuits situation.  Your patch reminds
me of a more ambitious attempt I made awhile back to reduce the amount
of duplicative boilerplate in eval_const_expressions.  I think I wrote
it during last year's beta period, stashed it because I didn't feel like
arguing for applying it right then, and then forgot about it.  Blowing
the dust off, it's attached.  It fixes ArrayRef and RowExpr as well as
ScalarArrayOpExpr, with a net growth of only 20 lines (largely comments).

> On a side-note, I find it a bit awkward that ScalarArrayOpExpr uses a 
> 2-element List to hold the scalar and array arguments. Wouldn't it be 
> much more straightforward to have explicit "Expr *scalararg" and "Expr 
> *arrayarg" fields?

I think it's modeled on OpExpr, which also uses a list though you could
argue for separate leftarg and rightarg fields instead.

                        regards, tom lane

diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c
index a1dafc8..95489f4 100644
*** a/src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c
--- b/src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c
*************** static List *find_nonnullable_vars_walke
*** 115,120 ****
--- 115,123 ----
  static bool is_strict_saop(ScalarArrayOpExpr *expr, bool falseOK);
  static Node *eval_const_expressions_mutator(Node *node,
  							   eval_const_expressions_context *context);
+ static bool contain_non_const_walker(Node *node, void *context);
+ static bool ece_function_is_safe(Oid funcid,
+ 					 eval_const_expressions_context *context);
  static List *simplify_or_arguments(List *args,
  					  eval_const_expressions_context *context,
  					  bool *haveNull, bool *forceTrue);
*************** estimate_expression_value(PlannerInfo *r
*** 2443,2448 ****
--- 2446,2482 ----
  	return eval_const_expressions_mutator(node, &context);
  }
  
+ /*
+  * The generic case in eval_const_expressions_mutator is to recurse using
+  * expression_tree_mutator, which will copy the given node unchanged but
+  * const-simplify its arguments (if any) as far as possible.  If the node
+  * itself does immutable processing, and each of its arguments were reduced
+  * to a Const, we can then reduce it to a Const using evaluate_expr.  (Some
+  * node types need more complicated logic; for example, a CASE expression
+  * might be reducible to a constant even if not all its subtrees are.)
+  */
+ #define ece_generic_processing(node) \
+ 	expression_tree_mutator((Node *) (node), eval_const_expressions_mutator, \
+ 							(void *) context)
+ 
+ /*
+  * Check whether all arguments of the given node were reduced to Consts.
+  * By going directly to expression_tree_walker, contain_non_const_walker
+  * is not applied to the node itself, only to its children.
+  */
+ #define ece_all_arguments_const(node) \
+ 	(!expression_tree_walker((Node *) (node), contain_non_const_walker, NULL))
+ 
+ /* Generic macro for applying evaluate_expr */
+ #define ece_evaluate_expr(node) \
+ 	((Node *) evaluate_expr((Expr *) (node), \
+ 							exprType((Node *) (node)), \
+ 							exprTypmod((Node *) (node)), \
+ 							exprCollation((Node *) (node))))
+ 
+ /*
+  * Recursive guts of eval_const_expressions/estimate_expression_value
+  */
  static Node *
  eval_const_expressions_mutator(Node *node,
  							   eval_const_expressions_context *context)
*************** eval_const_expressions_mutator(Node *nod
*** 2758,2763 ****
--- 2792,2816 ----
  				newexpr->location = expr->location;
  				return (Node *) newexpr;
  			}
+ 		case T_ScalarArrayOpExpr:
+ 			{
+ 				ScalarArrayOpExpr *saop;
+ 
+ 				/* Copy the node and const-simplify its arguments */
+ 				saop = (ScalarArrayOpExpr *) ece_generic_processing(node);
+ 
+ 				/* Make sure we know underlying function */
+ 				set_sa_opfuncid(saop);
+ 
+ 				/*
+ 				 * If all arguments are Consts, and it's a safe function, we
+ 				 * can fold to a constant
+ 				 */
+ 				if (ece_all_arguments_const(saop) &&
+ 					ece_function_is_safe(saop->opfuncid, context))
+ 					return ece_evaluate_expr(saop);
+ 				return (Node *) saop;
+ 			}
  		case T_BoolExpr:
  			{
  				BoolExpr   *expr = (BoolExpr *) node;
*************** eval_const_expressions_mutator(Node *nod
*** 2982,3022 ****
  			}
  		case T_ArrayCoerceExpr:
  			{
! 				ArrayCoerceExpr *expr = (ArrayCoerceExpr *) node;
! 				Expr	   *arg;
! 				ArrayCoerceExpr *newexpr;
! 
! 				/*
! 				 * Reduce constants in the ArrayCoerceExpr's argument, then
! 				 * build a new ArrayCoerceExpr.
! 				 */
! 				arg = (Expr *) eval_const_expressions_mutator((Node *) expr->arg,
! 															  context);
  
! 				newexpr = makeNode(ArrayCoerceExpr);
! 				newexpr->arg = arg;
! 				newexpr->elemfuncid = expr->elemfuncid;
! 				newexpr->resulttype = expr->resulttype;
! 				newexpr->resulttypmod = expr->resulttypmod;
! 				newexpr->resultcollid = expr->resultcollid;
! 				newexpr->isExplicit = expr->isExplicit;
! 				newexpr->coerceformat = expr->coerceformat;
! 				newexpr->location = expr->location;
  
  				/*
! 				 * If constant argument and it's a binary-coercible or
! 				 * immutable conversion, we can simplify it to a constant.
  				 */
! 				if (arg && IsA(arg, Const) &&
! 					(!OidIsValid(newexpr->elemfuncid) ||
! 				func_volatile(newexpr->elemfuncid) == PROVOLATILE_IMMUTABLE))
! 					return (Node *) evaluate_expr((Expr *) newexpr,
! 												  newexpr->resulttype,
! 												  newexpr->resulttypmod,
! 												  newexpr->resultcollid);
! 
! 				/* Else we must return the partially-simplified node */
! 				return (Node *) newexpr;
  			}
  		case T_CollateExpr:
  			{
--- 3035,3054 ----
  			}
  		case T_ArrayCoerceExpr:
  			{
! 				ArrayCoerceExpr *acexpr;
  
! 				/* Copy the node and const-simplify its arguments */
! 				acexpr = (ArrayCoerceExpr *) ece_generic_processing(node);
  
  				/*
! 				 * If all arguments are Consts, and it's a binary-coercible or
! 				 * safe conversion function, we can fold to a constant
  				 */
! 				if (ece_all_arguments_const(acexpr) &&
! 					(!OidIsValid(acexpr->elemfuncid) ||
! 					 ece_function_is_safe(acexpr->elemfuncid, context)))
! 					return ece_evaluate_expr(acexpr);
! 				return (Node *) acexpr;
  			}
  		case T_CollateExpr:
  			{
*************** eval_const_expressions_mutator(Node *nod
*** 3208,3248 ****
  				else
  					return copyObject(node);
  			}
  		case T_ArrayExpr:
  			{
! 				ArrayExpr  *arrayexpr = (ArrayExpr *) node;
! 				ArrayExpr  *newarray;
! 				bool		all_const = true;
! 				List	   *newelems;
! 				ListCell   *element;
! 
! 				newelems = NIL;
! 				foreach(element, arrayexpr->elements)
! 				{
! 					Node	   *e;
! 
! 					e = eval_const_expressions_mutator((Node *) lfirst(element),
! 													   context);
! 					if (!IsA(e, Const))
! 						all_const = false;
! 					newelems = lappend(newelems, e);
! 				}
! 
! 				newarray = makeNode(ArrayExpr);
! 				newarray->array_typeid = arrayexpr->array_typeid;
! 				newarray->array_collid = arrayexpr->array_collid;
! 				newarray->element_typeid = arrayexpr->element_typeid;
! 				newarray->elements = newelems;
! 				newarray->multidims = arrayexpr->multidims;
! 				newarray->location = arrayexpr->location;
! 
! 				if (all_const)
! 					return (Node *) evaluate_expr((Expr *) newarray,
! 												  newarray->array_typeid,
! 												  exprTypmod(node),
! 												  newarray->array_collid);
  
! 				return (Node *) newarray;
  			}
  		case T_CoalesceExpr:
  			{
--- 3240,3262 ----
  				else
  					return copyObject(node);
  			}
+ 		case T_ArrayRef:
  		case T_ArrayExpr:
+ 		case T_RowExpr:
+ 		case T_BooleanTest:
  			{
! 				/*
! 				 * Generic handling for node types whose own processing is
! 				 * known to be immutable, and for which we need no smarts
! 				 * beyond "simplify if all inputs are constants".
! 				 */
  
! 				/* Copy the node and const-simplify its arguments */
! 				node = ece_generic_processing(node);
! 				/* If all arguments are Consts, we can fold to a constant */
! 				if (ece_all_arguments_const(node))
! 					return ece_evaluate_expr(node);
! 				return node;
  			}
  		case T_CoalesceExpr:
  			{
*************** eval_const_expressions_mutator(Node *nod
*** 3319,3325 ****
  				 * simple Var.  (This case won't be generated directly by the
  				 * parser, because ParseComplexProjection short-circuits it.
  				 * But it can arise while simplifying functions.)  Also, we
! 				 * can optimize field selection from a RowExpr construct.
  				 *
  				 * However, replacing a whole-row Var in this way has a
  				 * pitfall: if we've already built the rel targetlist for the
--- 3333,3340 ----
  				 * simple Var.  (This case won't be generated directly by the
  				 * parser, because ParseComplexProjection short-circuits it.
  				 * But it can arise while simplifying functions.)  Also, we
! 				 * can optimize field selection from a RowExpr construct, or
! 				 * of course from a constant.
  				 *
  				 * However, replacing a whole-row Var in this way has a
  				 * pitfall: if we've already built the rel targetlist for the
*************** eval_const_expressions_mutator(Node *nod
*** 3334,3339 ****
--- 3349,3356 ----
  				 * We must also check that the declared type of the field is
  				 * still the same as when the FieldSelect was created --- this
  				 * can change if someone did ALTER COLUMN TYPE on the rowtype.
+ 				 * If it isn't, we skip the optimization; the case will
+ 				 * probably fail at runtime, but that's not our problem here.
  				 */
  				FieldSelect *fselect = (FieldSelect *) node;
  				FieldSelect *newfselect;
*************** eval_const_expressions_mutator(Node *nod
*** 3384,3389 ****
--- 3401,3417 ----
  				newfselect->resulttype = fselect->resulttype;
  				newfselect->resulttypmod = fselect->resulttypmod;
  				newfselect->resultcollid = fselect->resultcollid;
+ 				if (arg && IsA(arg, Const))
+ 				{
+ 					Const	   *con = (Const *) arg;
+ 
+ 					if (rowtype_field_matches(con->consttype,
+ 											  newfselect->fieldnum,
+ 											  newfselect->resulttype,
+ 											  newfselect->resulttypmod,
+ 											  newfselect->resultcollid))
+ 						return ece_evaluate_expr(newfselect);
+ 				}
  				return (Node *) newfselect;
  			}
  		case T_NullTest:
*************** eval_const_expressions_mutator(Node *nod
*** 3477,3535 ****
  				newntest->location = ntest->location;
  				return (Node *) newntest;
  			}
- 		case T_BooleanTest:
- 			{
- 				BooleanTest *btest = (BooleanTest *) node;
- 				BooleanTest *newbtest;
- 				Node	   *arg;
- 
- 				arg = eval_const_expressions_mutator((Node *) btest->arg,
- 													 context);
- 				if (arg && IsA(arg, Const))
- 				{
- 					Const	   *carg = (Const *) arg;
- 					bool		result;
- 
- 					switch (btest->booltesttype)
- 					{
- 						case IS_TRUE:
- 							result = (!carg->constisnull &&
- 									  DatumGetBool(carg->constvalue));
- 							break;
- 						case IS_NOT_TRUE:
- 							result = (carg->constisnull ||
- 									  !DatumGetBool(carg->constvalue));
- 							break;
- 						case IS_FALSE:
- 							result = (!carg->constisnull &&
- 									  !DatumGetBool(carg->constvalue));
- 							break;
- 						case IS_NOT_FALSE:
- 							result = (carg->constisnull ||
- 									  DatumGetBool(carg->constvalue));
- 							break;
- 						case IS_UNKNOWN:
- 							result = carg->constisnull;
- 							break;
- 						case IS_NOT_UNKNOWN:
- 							result = !carg->constisnull;
- 							break;
- 						default:
- 							elog(ERROR, "unrecognized booltesttype: %d",
- 								 (int) btest->booltesttype);
- 							result = false;		/* keep compiler quiet */
- 							break;
- 					}
- 
- 					return makeBoolConst(result, false);
- 				}
- 
- 				newbtest = makeNode(BooleanTest);
- 				newbtest->arg = (Expr *) arg;
- 				newbtest->booltesttype = btest->booltesttype;
- 				newbtest->location = btest->location;
- 				return (Node *) newbtest;
- 			}
  		case T_PlaceHolderVar:
  
  			/*
--- 3505,3510 ----
*************** eval_const_expressions_mutator(Node *nod
*** 3552,3565 ****
  	}
  
  	/*
! 	 * For any node type not handled above, we recurse using
! 	 * expression_tree_mutator, which will copy the node unchanged but try to
! 	 * simplify its arguments (if any) using this routine. For example: we
! 	 * cannot eliminate an ArrayRef node, but we might be able to simplify
! 	 * constant expressions in its subscripts.
  	 */
! 	return expression_tree_mutator(node, eval_const_expressions_mutator,
! 								   (void *) context);
  }
  
  /*
--- 3527,3583 ----
  	}
  
  	/*
! 	 * For any node type not handled above, copy the node unchanged but
! 	 * const-simplify its subexpressions.  This is the correct thing for node
! 	 * types whose behavior might change between planning and execution, such
! 	 * as CoerceToDomain.  It's also a safe default for new node types not
! 	 * known to this routine.
  	 */
! 	return ece_generic_processing(node);
! }
! 
! /*
!  * Subroutine for eval_const_expressions: check for non-Const nodes.
!  *
!  * We can abort recursion immediately on finding a non-Const node.  This is
!  * critical for performance, else eval_const_expressions_mutator would take
!  * O(N^2) time on non-simplifiable trees.  However, we do need to descend
!  * into List nodes since expression_tree_walker sometimes invokes the walker
!  * function directly on List subtrees.
!  */
! static bool
! contain_non_const_walker(Node *node, void *context)
! {
! 	if (node == NULL)
! 		return false;
! 	if (IsA(node, Const))
! 		return false;
! 	if (IsA(node, List))
! 		return expression_tree_walker(node, contain_non_const_walker, context);
! 	/* Otherwise, abort the tree traversal and return true */
! 	return true;
! }
! 
! /*
!  * Subroutine for eval_const_expressions: check if a function is OK to evaluate
!  */
! static bool
! ece_function_is_safe(Oid funcid, eval_const_expressions_context *context)
! {
! 	char		provolatile = func_volatile(funcid);
! 
! 	/*
! 	 * Ordinarily we are only allowed to simplify immutable functions. But for
! 	 * purposes of estimation, we consider it okay to simplify functions that
! 	 * are merely stable; the risk that the result might change from planning
! 	 * time to execution time is worth taking in preference to not being able
! 	 * to estimate the value at all.
! 	 */
! 	if (provolatile == PROVOLATILE_IMMUTABLE)
! 		return true;
! 	if (context->estimate && provolatile == PROVOLATILE_STABLE)
! 		return true;
! 	return false;
  }
  
  /*
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/rowtypes.out b/src/test/regress/expected/rowtypes.out
index 43b36f6..a4bac8e 100644
*** a/src/test/regress/expected/rowtypes.out
--- b/src/test/regress/expected/rowtypes.out
*************** ERROR:  cannot compare dissimilar column
*** 307,316 ****
  explain (costs off)
  select * from int8_tbl i8
  where i8 in (row(123,456)::int8_tbl, '(4567890123456789,123)');
!                                                    QUERY PLAN                                                    
! -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Seq Scan on int8_tbl i8
!    Filter: (i8.* = ANY (ARRAY[ROW('123'::bigint, '456'::bigint)::int8_tbl, '(4567890123456789,123)'::int8_tbl]))
  (2 rows)
  
  select * from int8_tbl i8
--- 307,316 ----
  explain (costs off)
  select * from int8_tbl i8
  where i8 in (row(123,456)::int8_tbl, '(4567890123456789,123)');
!                                   QUERY PLAN                                   
! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Seq Scan on int8_tbl i8
!    Filter: (i8.* = ANY ('{"(123,456)","(4567890123456789,123)"}'::int8_tbl[]))
  (2 rows)
  
  select * from int8_tbl i8
-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to