On May 11, 2017 8:08:11 AM PDT, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >On 11 May 2017 at 14:12, Petr Jelinek <petr.jeli...@2ndquadrant.com> >wrote: > >>> Attached patch is Petr's patch, slightly rebased with added pacing >>> delay, similar to that used by HSFeedback. >>> >> >> This looks reasonable. I would perhaps change: >>> + /* >>> + * Track lag no more than once per >WALSND_LOGICAL_LAG_TRACK_INTERVAL_MS >>> + */ >> >> to something like this for extra clarity: >>> + /* >>> + * Track lag no more than once per >WALSND_LOGICAL_LAG_TRACK_INTERVAL_MS >>> + * to avoid flooding the lag tracker on busy servers. >>> + */ > >New patch, v3. > >Applying in 90 minutes, barring objections.
Could you please wait till tomorrow? I've bigger pending fixes for related code pending/being tested that I plan to push today. I'd also like to take a look before... Thanks, Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
