On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> ... I'd like to propose to change relation >>> extension lock management so that it works using LWLock instead. > >> That's not a good idea because it'll make the code that executes while >> holding that lock noninterruptible. > > Is that really a problem? We typically only hold it over one kernel call, > which ought to be noninterruptible anyway. >
During parallel bulk load operations, I think we hold it over multiple kernel calls. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
