On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Also, looking at the patch, it doesn't look like it take enough care > to build execution state of new worker so that it can participate in a > running query. I may be wrong, but the execution state initialization > routines are written with the assumption that all the workers start > simultaneously? >
No such assumptions, workers started later can also join the execution of the query. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
