On 05/16/2017 10:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 5/16/17 18:14, pg...@postgresql.org wrote: >>> Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created. >> Was this change in naming pattern intentional? > Yes, it was. Andrew Dunstan suggested[1] during the > two-part-version-number discussion that we should start including a "_" > after REL in tag and branch names for v10 and later, so that those names > would sort correctly compared to the tag/branch names for earlier branches > (at least when using C locale). I believe his main concern was some logic > in the buildfarm, but it seems like a good idea in general. > > When we get to v100, we'll need some other hack to make it work ... > but I plan to be safely dead by then. >
Me too. Since posterity will be deprived of both of us let's note that the same hack will work, we'll just need two underscores. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
