On 2017-05-18 10:11:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Christoph Berg <m...@debian.org> writes:
> > *** 34,44 ****
> > --- 34,47 ----
> >   CREATE SEQUENCE sequence_test7 AS bigint;
> >   CREATE SEQUENCE sequence_test8 AS integer MAXVALUE 100000;
> >   CREATE SEQUENCE sequence_test9 AS integer INCREMENT BY -1;
> > + ERROR:  MINVALUE (-9223372036854775808) is out of range for sequence data 
> > type integer
> >   CREATE SEQUENCE sequence_test10 AS integer MINVALUE -100000 START 1;
> >   CREATE SEQUENCE sequence_test11 AS smallint;
> >   CREATE SEQUENCE sequence_test12 AS smallint INCREMENT -1;
> > + ERROR:  MINVALUE (-9223372036854775808) is out of range for sequence data 
> > type smallint
> >   CREATE SEQUENCE sequence_test13 AS smallint MINVALUE -32768;
> >   CREATE SEQUENCE sequence_test14 AS smallint MAXVALUE 32767 INCREMENT -1;
> > + ERROR:  MINVALUE (-9223372036854775808) is out of range for sequence data 
> > type smallint
> >   CREATE SEQUENCE sequence_testx AS text;
> >   ERROR:  sequence type must be smallint, integer, or bigint
> >   CREATE SEQUENCE sequence_testx AS nosuchtype;
> 
> Well, that's just wacko.  Somehow sequence.c's init_params() must
> be falling down on the job in selecting the right seqform->seqmin,
> but I'm darned if I see anything that's either wrong or potentially
> machine-dependent in that code.  It almost looks like it must be
> a compiler bug, though I hesitate to jump to that conclusion so
> quickly.  Peter, any ideas?

Weird.  Christoph, IIRC you can help gaining access to a porter machine
to reproduce this?

- Andres


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to