On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:38 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Amit Langote > <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > >> Do we need to update documentation? Perhaps, some clarification on the >> inheritance/partitioning behavior somewhere. > > Yeah, I think so.
Here is an attempt at documenting the situation in the CREATE TRIGGER notes section. >> - Assert((enrmd->reliddesc == InvalidOid) != (enrmd->tupdesc == NULL)); >> + Assert((enrmd->reliddesc == InvalidOid) != >> + (enrmd->tupdesc == NULL)); >> >> Perhaps, unintentional change? > > Agreed; line is not long enough to need to wrap. Fixed. >> I'm not sure if it's significant for transition tables, but what if a >> partition's BR trigger modified the tuple? Would we want to include the >> modified version of the tuple in the transition table or the original as >> the patch does? Same for the code in CopyFrom(). > > Good spot! If the BR trigger on the child table modifies or > suppresses the action, I strongly feel that must be reflected in the > transition table. This needs to be fixed. Gah. Right. In the attached version, there is a still an 'original tuple' optimisation for insertions (avoiding parent -> child -> parent conversion), but it's disabled if there are any BEFORE INSERT or INSTEAD OF INSERT row-level triggers. That's demonstrated by this part of the regression test, which modifies the value inserted into the 'CCC' partition (and similar case for COPY): insert into parent values ('AAA', 42), ('BBB', 42), ('CCC', 66); NOTICE: trigger = parent_stmt_trig, old table = <NULL>, new table = (AAA,42), (BBB,42), (CCC,1066) On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > +typedef struct TriggerTransitionState > +{ > ... > + bool ttf_delete_old_table; > > Just curious: why ttf_? TriggerTransition field? Oops. Changed to "tts_". I had renamed this struct but not the members. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
transition-tuples-from-child-tables-v7.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers