On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:07 AM, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > We still have the same copy shared across multiple append paths and > set_plan_refs would change change it underneath those. May not be a > problem right now but may be a problem in the future.
I agree. I think it's better for the path-creation functions to copy the list, so that there is no surprising sharing of substructure. set_plan_refs() obviously expects this data to be unshared, and this seems like the best way to ensure that's true in all cases. Committed that way. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
