On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 09:11:29AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 04:54:27PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> I will send an updated patch once we agree on above points. > >> >> > >> >> Sounds good. > >> > > >> > Attached patch addresses all the comments as discussed. > >> > >> Committed. > > > > Just checking, but you reused some of my code from the 8.3-8.4 migration > > in pg_upgrade that was removed a while back, rather than writing it from > > scratch, right? > > > > Yes, I have adapted it to what is required for hash indexes, adjusted > the code for v10 and there are some other minor changes in code.
Great, thanks. It was hard to do originally so I am glad you could reuse it. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
