On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Neha Khatri <nehakhat...@gmail.com> wrote: > As per my understabding, current postgres server supports only three > values for wal_level i.e. 'minimal' , 'replica' or 'logical'. But > following error message brought to notice that there are various code > spots that try to look for wal_level >= WAL_LEVEL_LOGICAL:
I suspect that this was intended as future-proofing. I think it's actually very reasonable to write the internal tests that way, but it does seem strange that it's crept into the user-visible error messages. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
