On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> By now, majority of the opinions have shown that they do not favour >> two triggers getting fired on a single update. Amit, do you consider >> option 2 as a valid option ? >> > > Sounds sensible to me. > >> That is, fire only UPDATE triggers. BR on >> source partition, and AR on destination partition. Do you agree that >> firing BR update trigger is essential since it can modify the row and >> even prevent the update from happening ? >> > > Agreed. > > Apart from above, there is one open issue [1] >
Forget to mention the link, doing it now. [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1KEZQ%2BCyXbBzfn1jFHoEfa_OemDLhLyy7xfD1QUZLo1DQ%40mail.gmail.com -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
