On 26/05/17 20:09, Erik Rijkers wrote:
On 2017-05-26 09:40, Simon Riggs wrote:
If we can find out what the bug is with a repeatable test case we can
fix it.
Could you provide more details? Thanks
I will, just need some time to clean things up a bit.
But what I would like is for someone else to repeat my 100x1-minute
tests, taking as core that snippet I posted in my previous email. I
built bash-stuff around that core (to take md5's, shut-down/start-up
the two instances between runs, write info to log-files, etc). But it
would be good if someone else made that separately because if that
then does not fail, it would prove that my test-harness is at fault
(and not logical replication).
Will do - what I had been doing was running pgbench, waiting until the
row counts on the replica pgbench_history were the same as the primary,
then summing the %balance and delta fields from the primary and replica
dbs and comparing. So far - all match up ok. However I'd been running a
longer time frames (5 minutes), so not the same number of repetitions as
yet.
regards
Mark
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
