On 2017-05-29 11:38:20 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: > Related, but not the same. It would be nice if they didn't block, but if > they do have to block, shouldn't it wait on a semaphore, rather than doing > a tight loop? It looks like maybe a latch didn't get reset when it should > have or something.
The code certainly is trying to just block using a lock (on the xid of the running xact), there shouldn't be any busy looping going on... There's no latch involved, so something is certainly weird here. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
