Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: > Agreed. Shouldn't this be back-patched? PG_CONTROL_VERSION has not > been bumped between 9.4 and 9.5. Attached is a patch for HEAD.
Pushed with minor adjustments. Notably, I didn't take your addition of canonicalize_path() and referencing the file by absolute path. That seems like an independent and rather debatable behavioral change. All the other files that pg_resetwal touches are referenced with relative paths; if we did want to change the reporting, shouldn't we change it for all of them? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers