Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> I'm not really for doing it that way, but I'm willing to apply the fix
>>>> if there's consensus for your position. Anybody else have an opinion?
> +1 from me, too. I don't see that there's enough advantage in
> avoiding a catversion bump to justify leaving this footgun behind.
The consensus seems pretty clear. I'll make it so.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
