Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > My vote would be to backpatch it all the way.
That's my thought too. Otherwise it'll be five years before extension authors can stop worrying about this issue. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers