On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, SH_TYPE's members SH_ELEMENT_TYPE *data and void *private_data > are not going to work in DSM, because they are pointers. You can > doubtless come up with a way around that problem, but I guess the > question is whether that's actually any better than just using DHT.
Probably I misunderstood the question. I assumed that we need to bring in DHT only for achieving this goal. But, if the question is simply the comparison of DHT vs simplehash for this particular case then I agree that DHT is a more appropriate choice. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
