On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Here is a proposed solution that splits bgw_name into bgw_type and > bgw_name_extra. bgw_type shows up in pg_stat_activity.backend_type. > Uses of application_name are removed, because they are no longer > necessary to identity the process type.
Hmm, is there any reasons why bgw_name_extra string doesn't appear in pg_stat_activity? I'd say current patch makes the user difficult to distinguish between apply worker and table sync worker. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
