On 2017-06-05 15:06:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > On 2017-06-05 14:57:10 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Meh. Without volatile, I think that the compiler would be within its > >> rights to elide the nentry local variable and re-fetch toc->toc_nentry > >> each time through the loop. > > > I don't think that's true. > > Perhaps not, but I'm not quite convinced. Anyway it doesn't matter, > at least not here.
If not, we have a bunch of bugs in other files. So if there are concerns, we should better resolve them. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
