Hi,

I have been experimenting with splitting  the ProcArrayLock into parts. 
That is, to Acquire the ProcArrayLock in shared mode, it is only necessary 
to acquire one of the parts in shared mode; to acquire the lock in 
exclusive mode, all of the parts must be acquired in exclusive mode. For 
those interested, I have attached a design description of the change.

This approach has been quite successful on large systems with the hammerdb 
benchmark. With a prototype based on 10 master source and running on 
power8 (model 8335-GCA with 2sockets, 20 core)
 hammerdb  improved by 16%; On intel (Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 
2.20GHz, 2 socket, 44 core) with 9.6 base and prototype hammerdb improved 
by 4%. (attached is a set of spreadsheets for power8.

The down side is that on smaller configurations (single socket) where 
there is less "lock thrashing" in the storage subsystem and there are 
multiple Lwlocks to take for an exclusive acquire, there is a decided 
downturn in performance. On  hammerdb, the prototype was 6% worse than the 
base on a single socket power configuration.

If there is interest in this approach, I will submit a patch.

Jim Van Fleet



Attachment: compare_10base_toPrototype.ods
Description: Binary data

Attachment: patchDescription.odt
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to