Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > It doesn't seem like a problem to me if somebody else wants to extend > it to hostaddr, though. Whether that change belongs in v10 or v11 is > debatable. I would object to adding this as an open item with me as > the owner because doesn't seem to me to be a must-fix issue, but I > don't mind someone else doing the work.
If you want to define multiple-hostaddrs as a future feature, that seems fine, but I think Heikki is describing actual bugs. The minimum that I think needs to be done for v10 is to make libpq reject a hostaddr string with the wrong number of entries (either different from the host list, or different from 1). regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers