Andrew Dunstan <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > The whole thing is explained here: > <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20327.1322435...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> And since then the buildfarm has acquired a separate optional module > that tests pg_upgrade. It's enabled by default in the sample config file. > So it's not like we don't have buildfarm coverage - we do in fact. > Re-enabling this in the Makefile would a) result in breakage on some > members and b) make most members do redundant work. > I vote for improving the docs. WFM, I'll go do that (and maybe improve the comment in the makefile) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers