Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 6/9/17 11:12, Tom Lane wrote: >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/27064.1134753...@sss.pgh.pa.us
> Good to know. That just says that if we were to go with the strcoll()
> result only, things would work correctly.
There's still the hashing problem.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
