On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > If I create a publication "for all tables", \dRp+ doesn't indicate it is for > all tables, it just gives a list of the tables. > > So it doesn't distinguish between a publication specified to be for all > tables (which will be dynamic regarding future additions), and one which > just happens to include all the table which currently exist. > > That seems unfortunate. Should the "for all tables" be included as another > column in \dRp and \dRp+, or at least as a footnote tag in \dRp+ ? >
+1. I was thinking the same. Attached patch adds "All Tables" column to both \dRp and \dRp+. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
psql_publication.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
